|
The Ministry Experience Report (MER): Model A
Model A >
[Model B] >
[Example 1] >
[Example 2]
- Background Information
What do we need to know in order to understand the context of your experience? What is your relationship to the other person(s) in the report? Please remember that all pertinent information should be shared so that group members can understand the experience fully.
- Dialogue
Write up the dialogue as much as possible. For example:
Larry: I have been "down" all week. I have so many pressures on me—financial, family, this job. I am really depressed.
Jim: It sounds as if you are struggling. Want to talk about it?
Larry: I do and I don't. What's the point of sharing my problems with you? You're not a counselor!
Jim: But sometimes it's important to begin to share a difficult situation with a friend. I am your friend, Larry.
Larry: I know you are. I just hate to burden you.
Jim: Talk to me.
The conversation provides an opportunity for group members to see what you said in a "real life" situation. It cannot be exact, since it will be written following the experience. An honest recollection of the event, rather than exactness, is needed here. It will be the main entry point into the theological reflection of the group.
- The Dynamic Reflection
What has the conversation revealed about the reported experience? The other person(s) involved? Do you see problems and strengths in your interactions?
- Theological Reflection
What theological principles, concepts, or ideas are present in the experience? What theological reflection will shed light on this experience? Questions to consider:
• How is God working here?
• What does this experience say about the nature of life?
• What meaning is present here?
• How does this experience challenge the way I look at the world?
- Self-Critical Appraisal
Without becoming involved in self-judgment, ask yourself these questions:
• How do I feel as I minister with this person?
• Was my response adequate?
• After a period of reflection, what would I do differently?
|
|
